A recent New York Times profile casts John McCain as a tough guy for his response to the attacks of September 11. His response was to seize the media spotlight to call for a bunch of unrelated wars. The fact that McCain was duped by the charlatan Ahmed Chalabi doesn't seem to detract from the senator's reputation as a straight talking maverick. For that matter, nobody outside the blogosphere seems terribly concerned that McCain's top foreign policy and national security adviser was one of Chalabi's closest American allies.
McCain initially called for widespread attacks against Al Qaeda and any country that might have harbored or even condoned Al Qaeda:
"In a marathon of television and radio appearances, Mr. McCain recited a short list of other countries said to support terrorism, invariably including Iraq, Iran and Syria.
There is a system out there or network, and that network is going to have to be attacked,” Mr. McCain said the next morning on ABC News. “It isn’t just Afghanistan,” he added, on MSNBC. “I don’t think if you got bin Laden tomorrow that the threat has disappeared,” he said on CBS, pointing toward other countries in the Middle East.
Within a month he made clear his priority. “Very obviously Iraq is the first country,” he declared on CNN. By Jan. 2, Mr. McCain was on the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt in the Arabian Sea, yelling to a crowd of sailors and airmen: “Next up, Baghdad! [NYT]
The article doesn't mention that McCain was flat-out wrong. There was Al Qaeda wasn't in Iraq in 2001. Ironically, there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq until after the U.S. invaded the country and overthrew the government. Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11.
McCain began plumping for a war on Iraq a full 6 months before the White House dared to float the idea. "The Sept. 11 attacks 'demonstrated the grave threat posed by a hostile regime, possessing weapons of mass destruction, and with reported ties to terrorists,' Mr. McCain wrote--this was in an email to the New York Times last Friday. The factual errors contained in this sentence alone should disqualify McCain for the presidency.
The senator became frustrated when American intelligence agencies were unable to supply evidence of the non-existent link between 9/11 and Iraq. So, he turned to an Iraqi exile named Ahmed Chalabi for information. Chalabi had a conflict of interest, to put it mildly, seeing as he was counting on the United States to overthrow Saddam Hussein and install him as the leader of Iraq.
In 2006, the majority of the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Chalabi's organization proffered "false information" in an attempt to "influence U.S. policy towards Iraq" before the Iraq war.
One of Chalabi's closest American associates was none other than Randy Scheunemann, the man who would eventually become the top foreign policy advisor to McCain 2008. Yes, the same Randy Scheunemann who lobbied John McCain on behalf of the Republican of Georgia while he was working on the McCain campaign. Yes, the same Randy Scheunemann who went into business with now-disgraced lobbyist and international influence peddler Stephen Payne.
As a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, Scheunemann wrote the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which gave the Iraqi National Congress $98 million and committed the US to overthrowing the government of Iraq.
Scheunemann founded and lead the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which was itself a spin off of the Project for a New American Century. John McCain and Joe Lieberman were honorary CLI co-chairs. CLI lobbied aggressively for the invasion of Iraq.
A former INC staffer told TPM Muckraker that Chalabi and Scheunemann were friends who worked closely together. The INC even shared a Capitol Hill address with Scheunemann's lobbying firm, Orion Strategies.
The following anecdote illustrates the kind of working relationship that Scheunemann and Chalabi enjoyed. In June of 1998, weapons inspector Scott Ritter met with Scheunemann about a discovery that suggested that Iraq might be developing chemical weapons. Scheunemann thought this was something Chalabi should know about. So, he had Ritter driven to Chalabi's Georgetown apartment for an impromptu dinner party and sleepover. (Seriously.)
McCain exhorted the U.S. into an illegal war based on false intelligence from a suspected Iranian agent. Now, five years later, he named one of the chief architects of this debacle, Randy Scheunemann, to shape his foreign policy. When McCain says there will be other wars. If he's elected there will be.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight


Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Campaign Silo
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
Have McCain and his
lobbyistsadvisors ever found a war they could notuse as a source of revenuesupport?PS. Welcome aboard and thanks this auspicious debut piece.
Depends on how long China finances our misadventures.
You can only borrow a Billion a day for so long.
Pat Buchanan takes Bush and Obama to task:
It isn’t just Afghanistan,” he added, on MSNBC. “I don’t think if you got bin Laden tomorrow that the threat has disappeared,” he said on CBS, pointing toward other countries in the Middle East.Within a month he made clear his priority. “Very obviously Iraq is the first country,” he declared on CNN. By Jan. 2, Mr. McCain was on the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt in the Arabian Sea, yelling to a crowd of sailors and airmen: “Next up, Baghdad! [NYT]
McCain’s comments seem a little to spot on with what happened
http://www.usatoday.com/news/w...../saudi.htm
Why call for an attack on Iraq when Saudi Arabia sent 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi but not one was Iraq?
If not an endowed chair at the American Enterprise Institute, then at least a job as a host at the Bush Presidential Library/Amusement Park.
Because Iraq has much oil and does not fund any part of the Bush family trust funds.
Hi mod my comment at 5 reads
It isn’t just Afghanistan,” he added, on MSNBC. “I don’t think if you got bin Laden tomorrow that the threat has disappeared,” he said on CBS, pointing toward other countries in the Middle East.
but it should not be crossed out can you fix it please? Thank You.
BILLIONS upon billions in the DEATH trade going to those JLUBs….i cant tolerate that
Yeah I agree but I think it was all organized the GOP wanted any to use any disturbance in the Middle East to attack Iraq.
That’s pretty much it. Invading Saudi Arabia is inconceivable but Iraq under Saddam Hussein with specious ties to 9/11 was perceived as the oil field equivalent of the Oklahoma land rush.
old fat fu**********ks emptying our Treasury ..in the human death,suffering and destruction trade,when Afghan and Iraq women give birth underweight and sickly babies………i cant look at their monsterous faces…is it ok with you Cokie?
and Joe Shortride,deserves a long terminal extremely painful disease
McCain began plumping for a war on Iraq a full 6 months before the White House dared to float the idea.
Was John carrying water for Bush that early? Who gave John this intelligence and told him nothing would happen to him if he leaked it to the press?
Iraq having WMD should have been classified unless Bush declassified it but that means John was the favored lap dog of the White House chosen to spread the lies about WMD that got us to war.
I wonder if John was one of Judy Miller’s sources?
McBush is all bellicose posturing all the time…
Of course that’s election rhetoric- who knows what he’d do if he got the white house- but when he says he’s got better credentials on foreign policy- he MEANS- “I’ll bomb anyone who even LOOKS like they threaten the US of A.
Trouble is- people love this shit- and McBush may win with it.
When McCain says there will be other wars. If he’s elected there will be.
Does 100 years of war McCain know that England lost the 100 years war?
With what army will we free Georgia?
1,737 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Lindsay Beyerstein:
Good post…the best way ta understand American corporate fascism and the way it’s politics works today is to watch “Syriana”.
McCrazy’s campaign is right outta the original script.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, THERE IS NO MIDDLE GROUND AND NO COMPROMISING WITH FASCISM!!
Wonder if the reporters on the straight talk express can get McBush to say that he would go to war with Russia to “save” Georgia.
At the moment- he’s gettin to have it both ways- “I’d be tough”- without having to say that he’d go toe to toe- in a thermonuclear confrontation with the Russkies.
The trick here is to get him to answer the question “Would you go to war with Russia over this issue- or are you just advocating some appeasor handslappin shit”?
A man can live on past his own life, but not past the death of his Word/Honor. Joe has been the unholy walking dead for years now.
drive-by welcome to Lindsay - will return after necessary caffeination is complete…. *g*
Reminds me of the classic curse: “May he inherit a boatload of money, and may it be insufficient to pay his doctor bills.”
Wonder if the reporters on the straight talk express can get McBush to say that he would go to war with Russia to “save” Georgia.
I’m surprised he hasn’t called for war already. John is in such a bad position if America backs down on an invasion after all the tough talk he has already said.
LB:
I think you misunderstand cause and effect here. No one was “duped” by Chalabi. He was a “charlatan” only in relation to some out of the loop people, or peole pretending not to know what was up, in the press (thus their scandalized tone when it was revealed what he was). Otherwise, he was an asset to the people who wanted the Iraq war. McCain was on board with that project from the beginning, so he wasn’t interested in asking questions of Chalabi.
The same goes for Scheunemann — a lot of people think he is an agent of Georgia who has somehow got McCain’s ear, that somehow little Georgia has scored a coup in infuence peddling. Scheunemann works for our neocons. If anyone is a dupe it’s Georgia for electing someone beholden to us, Saakashvili.
this is an excellany piece lynday. I have one bit of critisism;
this “illegal” stuff is too benign and doesn’t do the trick, it would be much more effective if it read;
“McCain exhorted the U.S. into war using false intelligence, intelligence these individuals knew was false and this crreated more terrorism, it could not possibly aid in our fight against our enemies and they knew it”
that’s a little verbose but the “illegal war” stuff just doesn’t do the trick, it plays right into the “concervatives” narative
that would be a direct IV in your case, no?
Just looking at Chalabi he raises hackles of distrust, base of the neck where the hackles generally reside, and the ones in the base of the brain.
What time zone does this blog use?
that would be a direct IV in your case, no?
yep. One in each arm.
McCain was agitating for war with Iraq long before Bush was (and well before 9/11.) And there was no need for him to get the WMD allegation from any government intelligence, he was getting it straight from the source (Chalabi) through his pal Scheunemann.
What time zone does this blog use?
Left Coast, Left-Wing, DFH time-zone.
He backed off that. Unsurprising you didn’t know that, as neither the media nor the Obama campaign saw fit to accurately depict him as a dangerous, big-mouthed provocateur trying to win an election at the expense of the country.
And now the “Prince”
http://www.sparknotes.com/phil.....ion8.rhtml
McCain wants to be a Lion to Georgia but Bush has us tied down in Iraq so he can’t.
McCain at best is being led down the garden path by Foxes like Bush and Ahmed Chalabi at worse McCain is dumb enough to think he is using them more than they are using him.
McCain is a lamb in Foxes clothing!
I know it’s just one in a very long list of IOKIYAR, but if any Democrat had a top advisor who was a paid agent of a foreign government while the campaign was going on (and only stopped made it more indirect once it came out in the press), it would be political suicide.
Glenzilla takes Biden (and U.S. in general) to task for pugnaciousness:
Bill Kristol, for example, was an important figure in his 2000 presidential campaign.
He is the ur-neocon political candidate (Quayle was the failed prototype). He was at the front of leading the war with Serbia (he loudly criticized Clinton for foregoing the threat of a ground invasion). In retrospect it’s clear: Kosovo was the test case for the principle of “regime change” in the cause of “humanitarian intervention” that would be applied to Iraq.
Without getting confirmation from the CIA just how dumb is he to be taken by a con like that?
I got a bridge John might want to buy:)
Also I gave up TV At least until the debates.
It’s interesting that when the Obama campaign tried pointing that out the McCain campaign was ready with a sharp response, aided by allies in the press like Politico: that criticism sounds an awful lot like what the Kremlin is saying.
No premises, much less ties, of the warmongers are ever questioned.
I gave up TV years ago (so it comes as a shock whenever I do catch a snippet of that decrepit old loon talking — he really is the fucking Manchurian candidate, of the neocons). I read it online!
Great Post! Of course there are plenty of “links” between 9-11 attacks and Price Bandar and Busharaff (and the Albritons).
But I am still thinking it is all about the OIL! And it is about “deferred compensation”=”bribes” to Darth Cheney. It is also all about a corrupt Congress controlled by the Oil Companies and corrupt journalists who are really neo-con lobbyists. Chris and Kookie and Anderson catapult the Exxon propaganda and that is why they get the big bucks.
http://www.pubrecord.org/natio.....?task=view
The world’s most pugnacious and tough-talking lamb.
I had opened the DIGG on this for Lindsay and FDLpups. Now I return to see that it was not registered. Something appears to be broken! It is important for me to cheer Lindsay on. Long-time admirer of her work here.
and mavericky, too!
Nice post & it is good to see you, Lindsay. The offical Time Zone is Minus 5, Romeo.
But exactly what about that oil?
Saddam was willing to sell us as much of it as we wanted at prevailing market price. The Cayman Islands oil giants — that’s where they claim to be headquartered — that are now signing leases with Iraq will sell us all we want at prevailing market prices. What fucking difference does it make to the average American taxpayer?
No one seems to be able to ask the simple question. If Bush and McCain and to a lesser degree Obama, got their way and fast tracked Georgia into NATO. Would the US be fighting a groundwar on Russia’s doorstep right now in order to save Georgia?
-G
Agreed
Don Knotts with Joe Pesci’s voice
The Russian sense of humor:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26284851/page/2/
No difference to the taxpayers. Big difference for people like Cheney and the Bush family.
Good Morning Lindsay and Firedogs,
a little loosely related o/t while we tread in this vat of slime -
the kewlest WH Counsel Evah is now a lobbyist for . . . wait for it
Pakistan !
my standing apology if previously posted
With what troops is a simple answer? Or do you think that Bush will move troops out of Iraq into Georgia.
Georgia is on Russia’s borders even an air strike won’t work because we would need enough planes in the area to take on the entire Russian airforce.
Priceless.
What won’t a Bushie do for money?
A lot of people are asking about whether Randy Scheunemann’s Georgia lobbying had anything to do with McCain’s bellicose stance on Iraq. Even the Washington Post took notice. It’s a damn good question. Let’s keep the pressure on!
Someone gave the Sakaashvilli the impression that the US would back his play and the WH swears it wasn’t them. Who were they talking to? Randy Scheunemann, and now Scheunemann’s business partner Mike Mitchell. Who do you think might have given S. the impression that the US was 100% on board with whatever stunt he wanted to pull? Hmmm.
I doubt that anyone, even the Decider, is willing to risk a direct military confrontation with Russia. There are not enough troops in all of Iraq to match up with the Russian military. If there’s growing tough talk from Bush, however, we should demand that any troop deployment includes members of the Bush family.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26284851/page/2/
In dealing with people, a prince must break his promises when they put him at a disadvantage and when the reasons for which he made the promises no longer exist. In any case, promises are never something on which a prince can rely, since men are by nature wretched and deceitful. A prince should be a master of deception.
http://www.sparknotes.com/phil…..ion8.rhtml
Condi your boss breaks promises all the time whether its to his advantage or no. I am unaware of what promise you think the Russians gave you but breaking said promise is to Russia’s advantage.
After all only an Idiot could not have forseen that Russia would not take advantage of American troops being tied down in Iraq for a long war.
Yes!
What do you expect from the worst Sec’y of State ever?
Whatever the outcome, Georgia is a nice little racket. Biden is graciously offering 1 billion of our money. Gravitas!
Someone gave the Sakaashvilli the impression that the US would back his play and the WH swears it wasn’t them. Who were they talking to? Randy Scheunemann, and now Scheunemann’s business partner Mike Mitchell. Who do you think might have given S. the impression that the US was 100% on board with whatever stunt he wanted to pull? Hmmm.
My money is on Darth he already ran a shadow intel group why not a shadow state dept? Its not like Condi has ever done anything in state after all.
Her resignation?
Why couldn’t Biden been that generous to us when the new Bankruptcy bill came along?
Saying things like that will get you the Condi scowl…her best negotiating ploy to date.
Hey as long as she doesn’t smile at me…I hear her husband is the jealous type:)
The term illegal war is in no way weak, and its usage does not provide a tool to the Iraq invasion defenders who do not want their position to be confronted with what is written in the United States Constitution and in international law.
Were the Constitution taken seriously by most Members of the House and of the Senate, the presentation of convincing evidence that a President waged illegal war would result in impeachment and conviction.
McWar was one of 7 co sponsors
of Chalabi in 2003
“He’s a patriot who has the best interests of his country at heart.”
Redshift: are you Steve Shapiro of the same handle (Redshift) out of Carmel?